Skip to main content

Materials shape a building's environmental impact long before construction begins. Unlike consumer goods, buildings are meant to last decades. The choices made during design and construction determine not only the amount of job-site waste generated, but also a building’s long-term maintenance needs and its end-of-life options. 

StopWaste’s work in building materials is guided by three core principles:

  1. Upstream waste prevention
  2. Circular economic solutions
  3. Healthy communities and ecosystems.

Together, these approaches help reduce emissions, conserve resources, strengthen regional economies, and support more resilient buildings.  

Upstream Waste Prevention 

Preventing waste starts long before materials reach the jobsite. Upstream strategies reduce environmental impact by using fewer resources and designing buildings that last longer and perform better. 

Effective approaches include: 

  • Reusing existing buildings whenever possible
  • Designing efficiently to optimize layouts and reduce unnecessary materials
  • Working with standard material dimensions to minimize offcuts and waste
  • Designing for “fit,” ensuring components integrate cleanly
  • Using industrialized construction methods (e.g., panelized or factory-built components) that optimize manufacturing and reduce onsite waste
  • Leveraging modular construction, which allows buildings to be disassembled and reassembled for future use

These strategies reduce emissions, cut costs, and create buildings that are easier to maintain and adapt over time.  

Circular Economic Solutions 

A circular approach views materials not as disposable, but as resources that can be harvested, reused, and transformed into new value. 

Circular building solutions include: 

  • Recovering valuable materials from waste streams, such as agricultural or forestry byproducts used in biobased products 
  • Deconstructing buildings instead of demolishing them to salvage lumber, fixtures, and architectural components 
  • Scaling reuse infrastructure so salvaged materials can reenter the market 
  • Creating local markets for recycled and repurposed products 

These practices keep valuable materials in circulation, reduce environmental harm, and open economic opportunities across the region.  

Healthy Communities and Ecosystems 

The materials we choose affect not only climate outcomes, but also community health and ecological resilience. 

Key strategies include: 

  • Bioregional and regenerative sourcing, using materials that reflect the ecosystems, working lands, and cultural assets of the region 
  • Selecting low-carbon-emitting materials, such as low-carbon concrete or recycled products 
  • Shifting toward carbon-storing “biogenic” materials, such as straw, hemp, bamboo, and other plant-based fibers 
  • Supporting healthier indoor environments by choosing materials with lower toxicity and fewer harmful chemicals 

These approaches strengthen the connection between buildings, ecosystems, and the communities they serve. 

Building Materials as Part of a Regenerative Future

Material choices influence more than climate impact—they shape the resilience, identity, and long-term well-being of our communities. By designing for longevity, reusing what already exists, sourcing from our bioregions, and creating circular markets, we can shift from a “take-make-waste” model toward a system where buildings contribute positively to people and ecosystems.
Image
A variety of different building materials

Choosing Materials Wisely

StopWaste encourages material decisions informed by three key considerations: human health, circularity, and regenerative sourcing.
Image
Doors being loaded onto U-Haul

Construction Waste Reduction

In California, construction materials account for approximately 25 percent of the landfill stream.
Image
Room of people sitting facing four presenters

Policies

Policies, codes, and standards shape the materials we use in buildings.
Image
Photo of building using mass timber construction

CASE STUDY

1510 Webster Case Study

This case study examines 1510 Webster, a 19-story mass timber apartment building in Oakland developed by oWOW to provide affordable housing for middle-income households. Using an innovative point-supported timber structure instead of concrete saved $30 million and allowed all 16 wood-framed floors to be installed in under three months. The project also delivered major sustainability gains, offsetting over 2,300 metric tons of CO₂.